File Name: comparison of apache ii and gcs in post anesthesia care unit .zip
Risk prediction models allow clinicians to forecast which individuals are at a higher risk for developing a particular outcome. We developed and internally validated a delirium prediction model for incident delirium parameterized to patient ICU admission acuity. Risk factors included in the model were readily available in electric medical records. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic LASSO regression was used for model development.
Background: The acute physiology score is determined from the most deranged worst physiologic value, for example, the lowest blood pressure or the highest respiratory rate, during the initial 24 h after Intensive Care Unit ICU admission. The aim of present study is to apply Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II APACHE II scoring system to surgical patients who have been critically ill preoperatively requiring elective surgical intervention or who underwent extensive elective surgery thereby requiring post-operative critical care monitoring and treatment in the post-operative ward or ICU or surgical ward. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out on critically ill surgical patients from August to December in M. Hospital, Department of Surgery attached to Dr. Results: This study observed that From the patients enrolled the mean age was Conclusion: This scoring still provides a basic idea and uniform comparison of critical patients, thus help in research activities database validation.
Severity scales are important adjuncts of treatment in the intensive care unit ICU in order to predict patient outcome, comparing quality-of-care and stratification for clinical trials. Even though disease severity scores are not the key elements of treatment, they are however, an essential part of improvement in clinical decisions and in identifying patients with unexpected outcomes. Prediction models do face many challenges, but, proper application of these models helps in decision making at the right time and in decreasing hospital cost. In fact, they have become a necessary tool to describe ICU populations and to explain differences in mortality. However, it is also important to note that the choice of the severity score scale, index, or model should accurately match the event, setting or application; as mis-application, of such systems can lead to wastage of time, increased cost, unwarranted extrapolations and poor science. Assessment of medical treatment outcome was started in , when Florence Nightingale first addressed this issue. The rapid development of intensive care units ICUs created the need for quantitative and clinically relevant surrogate outcome measures in order to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment practices.
CONTEXT: The high-complexity features of intensive care unit services and the clinical situation of patients themselves render correct prognosis fundamentally important not only for patients, their families and physicians, but also for hospital administrators, fund-providers and controllers. Prognostic indices have been developed for estimating hospital mortality rates for hospitalized patients, based on demographic, physiological and clinical data. The predicted death rate was From the 2 x 2 decision matrix, The illness severity and death rate among clinical patients were higher than those recorded for surgical patients.
Show all documents The comparison of apache II and apache IV score to predict mortality in intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital Both APACHE models have shown good performance in the developed countries and other parts of the world. Thus, more studies in multiple center involving larger patient population are needed to validate both the scoring systems in developing countries like ours and separate scoring systems that correct the pitfalls in resource limited environment need to be developed for good predictability. In addition, an anesthesiologist was defined as a resident doctor 24 hours. This changes caused us to have anticipation of less mortality and more favorable outcome but this was not the case as is shown here. A comparison of these two studies is shown in Table 7. In the present study, APACHE II with a score of 15 gave the best diagnostic accuracy to predict mortality of patients with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of
Request PDF | Comparison of APACHE II and GCS in post anesthesia care unit (PACU) | The predicting outcome of patients admitted in the intensive care unit.
Objective: To compare the effects of early tracheostomy and of late tracheostomy in patients with acute severe brain injury. Desenvolvido por:. Introduction Tracheostomy is a procedure commonly performed in patients admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure. Tracheostomy has been reported to have advantages over translaryngeal intubation, although there is no consensus regarding such advantages. Among them, the following are of note: easier handling of the airways; greater patient comfort and facility of communication, reducing the need for sedation; possibility of oral feeding; improved respiratory mechanics; reduced trauma in the oral cavity; prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia VAP ; and easier weaning.
Correspondence Address : Dr. Introduction: Intensive care units ICUs receive obstetric patients with medical and surgical complications as well as obstetrical emergencies. These patients needing intensive care present an exclusive challenge both for the obstetrician as well as the intensivist. In developing countries such as India, due to scarcity of ICU resources, maternal morbidity and mortality of such patients is high.
He is an internationally recognised Clinician Educator with a passion for helping clinicians learn and for improving the clinical performance of individuals and collectives. He has completed fellowship training in both intensive care medicine and emergency medicine, as well as post-graduate training in biochemistry, clinical toxicology, clinical epidemiology, and health professional education. He is actively involved in in using translational simulation to improve patient care and the design of processes and systems at Alfred Health. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam.
PDF | On Jun 22, , Mohammad Hosseini published Comparison of APACHE II and GCS in post aesthesia care unit (PACU) | Find, read.Reply