File Name: monitoring and evaluation handbook .zip
Its goal is to improve current and future management of outputs, outcomes and impact. Monitoring is a continuous assessment of programmes based on early detailed information on the progress or delay of the ongoing assessed activities.
The credibility and objectivity of monitoring and evaluation reports depend very much on the independence of the evaluators. Their expertise and independence is of major importance for the process to be successful. The developed countries are using this process to assess their own development and cooperation agencies. An evaluation is a systematic and objective examination concerning the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and impact of activities in the light of specified objectives.
An important goal of evaluation is to provide recommendations and lessons to the project managers and implementation teams that have worked on the projects and for the ones that will implement and work on similar projects. Evaluations are also indirectly a means to report to the donor about the activities implemented.
It is a means to verify that the donated funds are being well managed and transparently spent. The evaluators are supposed to check and analyse the budget lines and to report the findings in their work. Monitoring is a continuous assessment that aims at providing all stakeholders with early detailed information on the progress or delay of the ongoing assessed activities.
Its purpose is to determine if the outputs, deliveries and schedules planned have been reached so that action can be taken to correct the deficiencies as quickly as possible. Good planning, combined with effective monitoring and evaluation, can play a major role in enhancing the effectiveness of development programs and projects.
Good planning helps focus on the results that matter, while monitoring and evaluation help us learn from past successes and challenges and inform decision making so that current and future initiatives are better able to improve people's lives and expand their choices. In monitoring, the feedback and recommendation is inevitable to the project manager but in evaluation, this is not the case.
The common ground for monitoring and evaluation is that they are both management tools. For monitoring, data and information collection for tracking progress according to the terms of reference is gathered periodically which is not the case in evaluations for which the data and information collection is happening during or in view of the evaluation.
The monitoring is a short term assessment and does not take into consideration the outcomes and impact unlike the evaluation process which also assesses the outcomes and sometime longer term impact. This impact assessment occurs sometimes after the end of a project, even though it is rare because of its cost and of the difficulty to determine whether the project is responsible for the observed results.
Monitoring checks on all the activities on the last [implementation stage] unlike Evaluation which entails information on whether the donated funds are well managed and that they are transparently spent. Although evaluations are often retrospective, their purpose is essentially forward looking.
Evaluations can also be used to promote new projects, get support from governments, raise funds from public or private institutions and inform the general public on the different activities. It is also very important as monitoring team give the recommendation to the school visited e.
S and G. The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness in February and the follow-up meeting in Accra underlined the importance of the evaluation process and of the ownership of its conduct by the projects' hosting countries. The credibility of findings and assessments depends to a large extent on the manner in which monitoring and evaluation is conducted.
To assess performance, it is necessary to select, before the implementation of the project, indicators which will permit to rate the targeted outputs and outcomes. According to the United Nations Development Programme UNDP , an outcome indicator has two components: the baseline which is the situation before the programme or project begins, and the target which is the expected situation at the end of the project. An output indicator that does not have any baseline as the purpose of the output is to introduce something that does not exist yet.
The most important agencies of the United Nations have a monitoring and evaluation unit. These norms concern the Institutional framework and management of the evaluation function, the competencies and ethics, and the way to conduct evaluations and present reports design, process, team selection, implementation, reporting and follow up. This group also provides guidelines and relevant documentation to all evaluation organs being part of the United Nations or not.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Social Studies of Science : Archived from the original on Retrieved Categories : Evaluation. Hidden categories: CS1 maint: archived copy as title. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version.
Abrahams, Naeema. Australian Agency for International Development. Basile, Kathleen C. Hertz and Sudie E. February Bloom, Shelah S.
Many of UNDP's relationships with countries and territories on the ground exceed 50 years. Find details on our successes and ongoing work. The UNDP Evaluation guidelines include six sections, which will be updated regularly to address changes within the organization. The guidance aims to provide a flexible and practical framework to enable governments and other development actors to develop a systematic approach to determining key areas, pathways, and parameters for evaluating national development strategies and SDGs. The Guidance will be followed by easy to use online tool. The IEO is the process of identifying champion countries for piloting the Guidance. Office Djibouti Dominican Republic E.
Jump to navigation. Handbook on monitoring and evaluating for results. Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below. Purposes and Definitions 5 Chapter 2. Planning for Monitoring and Evaluation 23 Chapter 4.
The Handbook on Monitoring and Evaluating for Results aims to support country offices in aligning their monitoring and evaluation systems around tracking and.
Millennium Development Goals. What We Do. Chapter 1:Planning, monitoring and evaluation for development results 1. Chapter 2: Planning for results: Practical applications 2. Chapter 3: Planning for monitoring and evaluation 3.
Monitoring and evaluation help in understanding how the assistance and support that CARE provides to disaster-affected communities affects them. It allows us to compare the results of our humanitarian actions with our strategic intent e.
Who is the Handbook for? The Handbook is aimed at BEE practitioners with little experience or knowledge of M&E approaches and practices. It is not intended to.Reply
The Monitoring and Evaluation Division is pleased to share this handbook as The handbook contains useful M&E tools and is supported by some theoretical rnasystemsbiology.org rnasystemsbiology.org This guide shows how to.Reply
Its goal is to improve current and future management of outputs, outcomes and impact.Reply